Paid Advertisement

Breaking News: 40B Analysis

To Advertise Call 781-585-0037

May 9th 2008

Table of Contents


Norwell's Experience Could Help Kingston
Defeat Beacon's 40-B Application

by Dennis N. Randall

(July 30, 2003)  Good news for Kingston! Developers in Norwell of two separate 40B proposals had their building plans rejected by the State Housing Finance Authority. MassHousing cited traffic safety and environmental impacts as two key reasons for deep-sixing the projects. The Queen Anne’s Corner and Baker Street projects rejected by the state called for a combined 62 condos on 32 acres of land. Each project was far smaller in scope and impact than the monster 780-unit project Beacon is trying to build in Kingston.

Anti-affordable housing forces use every tactic in the book to block unwanted projects. It’s an old game and the courts and state are very familiar with the ruse. Traffic is considered one of the trump cards and is played often -- usually without much success. The Norwell ruling is proof that when legitimate traffic concerns are raised they can be sufficient to stop a project dead in the water.

On its face the Beacon Proposal fails the traffic test. Sticking a small city at the end of a two-lane road already facing rush hour gridlock at times of peak traffic is a recipe for disaster and/or rejection. The suggestion that the town is somehow responsible for fixing Beacon’s traffic problem is nuts. It’s their proposal, their traffic and their problem. No town roads or ways should be upgraded or opened at taxpayer expense to help this project fly. The simple truth is the cost of building the necessary access roads and traffic control systems to support this project’s projected traffic flow could bankrupt even Bill Gates.

It’s our own fault we have a 40B gun pointed at our head. Over the last three decades town officials have refused or failed to draft a meaningful affordable housing plan. With no housing plan in place, there is no vehicle to block an unwanted 40B proposal. Only greed and poor planning by Beacon can save the town.

Beacon is likely to fail because they tried to cram as many housing units as physically possible into the 100+ acres next to the T-Station. They ignored local conditions and tried to fly in under radar with the assistance of four selectmen. It was Selectmen Mark Beaton who stopped the juggernaut in its tracks when he demanded a public hearing. Had Beaton not acted, the other four selectmen would have voted in June to adopt an affordable housing plan co-authored by Beacon Development and custom tailored to meet the needs of the developer.

Join 40B Discussion -- Read what Kingston thinks and add your thoughts


Paid Advertisement

 

Copyright © 2004
by First Choice Publishing

Website Designed & Maintained by
KingstonCreative.net