|
Paid Advertisement |
|
|
|
ZBA Incompetence |
To Advertise Call 781-585-0037 |
|
|
|
|
Conspiracy and Chaos Caught on Tape
by Dan Sapir The Zoning Board of Appeals is one of those obscure groups that you may come face-to-face with once in your life. But when you do, it can stop you from building that addition you had your heart set on. Worse, if you already built it, they can make you tear it down. Chapter 40-B, or the Snob Zoning Law better known as the Affordable Housing Regulations requires that all towns in the Commonwealth maintaining at least a 10% affordable housing stock. We are only at 3.8%. Developers can now present giant housing plans exempt from most town regulations as long as they include 25% of the units as “affordable”. There is only one board that hears these proposals. This board serves in a capacity to represent all boards in town. They are the ZBA. They are currently hearing two 40-B proposals that could add about 800 new homes in Kingston. They are also determining if they should overturn the Planning Board’s decision to deny the L. Knife expansion off Bradford Avenue. The board consists of political appointees all named by the Selectmen, most of them originally named a year ago by a far different board then you see today. The Observer has gone through considerable trouble to show you an inter-office memo put together by the ZBA Secretary. Patty Monroe is a lovely woman. What she isn’t is a member of the ZBA. The memo makes three key blunders:
Had the ZBA thanked Patty and reminded her that she was exceeding her authority, the matter would have been over. But we were curious. What would happen after “the public left the meeting”? The Observer hired a PAC-TV Cameraman and requested that the tape continue to roll after every member of the public physically left the meeting room. What followed was distressing and far worse then anything Monroe presented in her ill-advised letter:
Several issues must be addressed. First, it is becoming clear that the Zoning Board has a limited understanding of the law and their own function. A classic example was when the board was asked during the L. Knife appeal hearing if they had a copy of the Planning Board denial. It was, after all, the denial that was now before the ZBA. Not one member had a copy of the very foundation of what caused them to gather that evening. There is still a question of whether the ZBA is empowered to reverse a Planning Board decision. That matter is currently before Town Council. Follow this issue on line and on the Message Boards. Join Discussion: Fixing A Broken ZBA |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Copyright © 2003
by First Choice Publishing
Website Designed & Maintained by
KingstonCreative.net