|
(February 20, 2004)
I’m not a member of our Board of Selectmen, nor do I have any desire to add that
distinction to my resume. But if I were, I would ask to address my fellow board
members at the next meeting, take the microphone and say something like this.
“Mr. Chairman, I’d like one more chance to bring
the discussion of naming the ballfields before this board. At our last meeting,
it was very clear that the vote to name the town’s ballfields after Mr.
Opachinski has raised questions in the community. Our recent attempt to revisit
the question resulted in a divided board. After giving this matter further
thought, I would like to present another option for this board’s consideration.
“I realize that it may strain the patience of
those of you who want to keep the name as it is, but for the good of the town,
and in the spirit of being inclusive, I would ask your indulgence. I will take
but a few brief moments of your time.
“Mr. Chairman, there is a strong difference of
opinion over whether the ballfields should carry Mr. Opachinski’s name. I raise
this issue not to take anything away from the Opachinskis. They are respected
members of our community and I, too, honor what they have done for our town.
While I do not have the close friendship with the family that you do, that in no
way diminishes my appreciation for their work. However, one argument originally
advanced — that being that their financial contributions to the creation of the
ballfields somehow made them the leading contender for this distinction —
overlooks an important point.
“The true shareholders of these ballfields, Mr.
Chairman, are the residents and taxpayers of Kingston who voted to expend $1.7
million of their money to make these fields reality. Given the difficult
financial times that we face, this was no small leap of faith on the residents’
part. The ballfields belong to all of us, Mr. Chairman – not just the five
members on this board, but to every taxpayer and citizen of Kingston. And our
position, as Town Fathers, is to make decisions that reflect the best interests
of the community as a whole.
“Mr. Chairman, we have ten individual
ballfields that will soon be used by our community’s youth. Let’s think a little
creatively and use this as an opportunity to unite our town.
“Rather than assigning one person’s name to the
ballfield complex, I suggest assigning a generic overall name to the fields,
such as the Kingston Fields, the Pottle Street fields, or whatever the board and
residents determine to be appropriate – and then naming each individual field in
memory of someone from our town. So instead of one name, we’d have ten.
“Think of it, Mr. Chairman. Ten fields. Ten
chances to recognize ten people from our community. Each individual field would
honor someone whose life has made a difference in Kingston. Do you think we’d
have trouble coming up with ten names? Not on your life, Mr. Chairman.
“I can think of a few individuals whose
memories we will never forget. We have Melissa Benoit, whose tragic death
touched us all and whose mother in her deepest hour of grief paid our community
the highest compliment possible by saying “You have made Melissa not just my
daughter, but our daughter.” We have Jonathan Rizzo, by all accounts a fine
young man whose trust and generosity of spirit cost him his life. There is Billy
Hunt, a well-liked son of Kingston who died in the September 11 World Trade
Center tragedy. Let’s also not forget Billy Gould, our town’s first Vietnam war
casualty, whose death brought that war home and into sharp focus. Their stories
have had a strong impact on us all, whether we knew them personally or learned
about them from those who did. What a fitting way to insure that future
generations will remember these fine people.
“Mr. Chairman, think of our neighbors who have
contributed so many years of service to Kingston. Rocky Cole. George Cushman.
Joe Glass. And Mr.Opachinski. All are worthy of being honored. Coming up with
ten names wouldn’t be a problem. Limiting it to ten would be a far greater
challenge – but it’s a great problem to have!
“And, if it helps convince the rest of you that
this is a good idea, I’ll be the first to suggest that one of the ten fields
carry Mr. Opachinski’s name.
“I know that all of us are sick of reading
continual negative news about our hometown. We’ve had enough TV and newspaper
coverage about arrests and crimes and problems to last several lifetimes. Let’s
reverse this tide of negative opinion by doing something to lift this
community’s spirits and image.
“Mr. Chairman, let’s find a way to make this
happen. Let’s form a committee and solicit community input. Let’s get the town
involved in the nomination process – maybe the schools, too, with an essay
contest on “Kingston’s greatest citizens.” We could make it a real townwide
event, like the Old Home Days or Kingston’s 275th. These are details we can work
out.
“Mr. Chairman, no family member has approached
me on this topic and they might in fact be embarrassed that I even raise the
question. But I respectfully suggest that we give this serious consideration.
“We are leaders. Let’s lead by doing something
positive for this town that we care about and call home.
“Thanks for listening, Mr. Chairman. Would any
members of the board care to comment?”
|